Essay about The Glass Menagerie Comparison

Similarities of Two Tales “The Glass Menagerie” and “A Raisin in the Sun” are about families with different backgrounds and are placed in different eras of American history. In “A Raisin in the Sun,” an AfricanAmerican family struggles with keeping faith with their dreams and remaining optimistic. “The Glass Menagerie,” parallels to “A Raisin in the Sun,” with the family being Caucasian-American, struggling also to survive and to climb towards a better future. Despite the two families differences in background and eras, there are many connections between their economic, social, and individual scenarios.

Each is a family of three dealing with poverty and with the absence of a father in the household. “The Glass Menagerie,” features Amanda the mother, and her children, Laura and Tom. “A Raisin in the Sun” features Mama the mother, and her children, Beneatha and Walter. Amanda and Mama each push their children to obtain better lives for themselves, and the family. Laura and Beneatha struggle with the concept of marriage and how they will live out their futures. Tom and Walter battle internally with the concept of supporting their families and yet desiring their own dreams.

Another similarity in the two stories, the mother drives the plot. Both moms have set objectives to take a stab at and eventually they each want the best for their kids. Whether that be moving to another house or finding a spouse for her little girl, the mother tries her hardest to make the right decision. Both Mama and Amanda are experiencing the difficulties of being single parents living in destitution.

In any case, Mama is a loving and Amanda was critical. Each mother concentrates on urging her youngsters to make a big deal about them so as to improve the welfare of heir futures. Amanda and Mama were similarly involved in their children’s lives, but drew closer in their parental styles in unexpected ways. Amanda was a nagging mother who censured Tom and Laura. Mama’s disposition was more cherishing towards Walter and Beneatha. Mama encouraged Walter to achieve his dreams in an ethical way, and was sensitive to Beneatha’s concerns about men. Amanda was more pushy towards Laura urging her to simply take any man who seemed willing deal with her.

Despite the implication that Amanda’s pushiness was due to care, Mama vocalized that her pushiness was based on the grounds that she wants her children to be successful. Laura and Beneatha are altogether different, yet both battle with the idea of marriage. Laura doesn’t appear as driven as Beneatha. It’s difficult to say what Laura’s precise aspirations are other than appreciating music, her glass Glass Mengarie, and her tendency to wander off into her own world. Both girls appear to find difficulties in understanding what they’re searching for in a future spouse.

Laura can only think about the way that she really liked an individual named Jim in secondary school. Beneatha is torn between dating George and Joseph, but decides she prefers Joseph who is superior to anything offered by her beau George. Be that as it may, Joseph challenges her with desire to wed, and leave America. Their siblings all affect both Laura and Beneatha. Laura is always angry with her Tom in a compassionate way. Beneatha understands her reliance on her sibling and winds becoming closer to him. Tom relinquishes Laura.

Jim and Joseph majorly affect Laura and Beneatha’s feelings. Jim tries to persuade Laura that she is ordinary and that her modesty is appealing. By Jim telling Laura that she’s a woman that she’s not he’s as it were attempting to change who she really is, by her trusting herself to be that. Joseph is additionally attempting to change Beneatha. Joseph gets Beneatha to trim her hair to be more African, and to embellish her self to fit his optimal picture of what she ought to look like. Jim, and Joseph both “break” Laura and Beneatha.

Laura gets her trust up around a potential sentiment with Jim, and afterward Jim smashs her heart by revealing that he’s engaged. Obviously their communication changed Laura. Like Jim affecting Laura altogether, Beneatha winds up accepting Joseph’s points of view versus her own. Rather than seeking after her dreams of freedom, not wedding, and becoming a doctor, she winds up considering him to be a friend in need. In this way, Beneatha arranges to wed Joseph, and move to Nigeria. Each Jim and Joesph challenge Laura and Beneatha’s identities.

Toward the end of each play, both Laura and Beneatha are changed because of men. There is a fundamental contrast between Tom and Walter. Other than their ability to immerse themselves in their dreams, in how they hand responsibility. While Tom gives his desires a chance to beat his ethical judgment and deserts his family, Walter feels is compelled to deal with reality. While Tom surrenders his family, Walter, though reluctantly, comes to hold with the Younger family’s situation, and chooses to make a big deal about his own life, as well as for his family purpose.

Tom then again, does not see through his illusions of glory, and accordingly, turns into a man led on by his fantasies. Another simple examination between the two stories is the focal subject, which is Reality versus Fantasy. Tom sticks on to these dreams even at the expense of eliminating reality, since it gives him a feeling of reason. In the event that dealing with his nagging mother and debilitated little sister is the life bound for Tom, then it is an existence not living for.

He feels that to locate his significance in life, he should cut his misfortunes with his family and make progress toward those objectives, for better or for most exceedingly terrible. Inevitably, his intensity wins over, as he chooses to cut his misfortunes and lose himself in his produced illusions. Walter Lee is fundamentally the same as, or verging on indistinguishable, in that appreciation. Toward the start of the play, Walter Lee needs to put resources into an alcohol store with his associates and with time, harvest a benefit from it.

This antasy of his comes at the expense of desensitizing himself from the predicament of his family. In any case, at the play’s peak, it is uncovered that Walter’s associates double-crossed him and kept running off with the cash and resources into the alcohol store. This is the defining moment for him, as he begins to come back to reality after the huge discovery. Walter picks reality, to assist with the family’s monetary issues, if just to discover a feeling of reason or even good faith in his life. Tom, who rather lives inside his own particular dream, repudiates this.

Essentially every one of the characters in “A Raisin In the Sun” need to do their own things yet battle because of an absence of wealth. The two stories are fundamentally parallel in two ways; their focal characters and the focal topic. Despite the fact that they do have likenesses, this doesn’t prohibit them from discernible contrasts, including the adjustments to Tom and Walter Lee’s character bends and how they responded to it. Basically, Tom let his dream aspirations guide him, while Walter Lee was constrained over into reality and bleakly grappled with it.

Still, the subject of Reality versus Fantasy stays continuous, the essential bond interfacing these two sorts out. Its additionally recognizable how poverty can strike groups of all races and religion, shown by the Wingfield and Younger families Truly, poverty can extend from different periods, be it the Great Depression of the 1930s or the Post-World War 2 isolated America in which these were written. This is additionally a central association, in which destitution is apparently interminable in the numerous homes and in the families it can begin in.

With two substantial contentions supporting the similitudes between “A Raisin in the Sun” and “The Glass Menagerie,” it could be gathered that maybe Lorraine Hansberry, the creator of “A Raisin in the Sun”, took a few thoughts from Tennessee William’s “The Glass Menagerie. ” Still, as the current contention finds some conclusion, it is noticed that while these two scholarly pieces have a few striking likenesses, the way they have taken care of the same subject utilizing differentiating points of view and gadgets that has made “A Raisin in the Sun” and “The Glass Menagerie” both diverse in their own specific manners.