Do celebrities deserve privacy? Introduction There is no doubt that the privacy is becoming a really serious issue in our daily lives. In addition, everyone has his/her own world and life that they do not want to share it with others. For example, in the last decade, the development of social media and online technology changed the way of defining of privacy. The privacy on the internet can be defined as “the ability to control the conditions under which personal information is disclosed to others”(Rosen, 2000).
However, the concept of privacy is difficult to understand and also is not that easy to define (Tavani, 1999) because this concept is linked with various features just as the personal information, personal behaviour and currently, personal communications and personal body (Clarke, 1999). As technology developed, we cannot help but lose a sense of privacy. Rosen explained the use of internet background checks and the widespread performance of them in all types of situations, and when dealing with prospective romantic partners.
There are many newspapers, news, and magazines which concentrate on what the pop singers, movie stars doing with every little information. Throughout these media, the fans can easily know everything related to the stars. However, well known people are wanting to lead simple normal lives without intense scrutiny as well. This essay will discuss and illustrate people’s opinions about privacy for the famous people. For the social media matter with the famous people , Some people think that the Internet has no privacy now due to the dangerousness of sharing their information on the internet.
Moreover, 81 percent of internet users are worrying about threats to the privacy that they have while online. With today’s increasing usage of computers and the internet a whole new world know has taken shape. (Encyclopedia Britannica,2014). However, the abnormal people such a celebrities are annoyed and suffering from lack of privacy. Catherine Zeta Jones was extremely annoyed when the celebrity magazine posted without a right pictures of their wedding day. She has reached at the High Court in central London where she made a ? 00,000 damages claim against Hello! magazine (BBC, 2003).
Some people think that famous people should have their private lives as the normal people and if someone is famous does not mean that we must intervene their private lives and try to know everything about them. They have their own families, lovers, and friends who are always staying with to share their moods, thinking and give them motivation. If they were always surrounded by the fans population and reporters, they will be affected by the media’s sensationalism and lead lives in anguish and pain.
They are as every one of us as citizens who unquestionably have the right to privacy. The fundamental right which should keep safe, respected and guaranteed by the laws and regulations which are under any conditions (United Nations, 2005). In addition, they say that can make the typical individuals understand the considerable subtle elements of stars in this manner they can fulfil their interest to the full. However, those exposed people can be severely harmed by such press attention. A huge amount of interesting stories about their private lives may lead them to unhappiness life.
Paparazzi claim that their work is to supply news, because celebrities are in the spotlight, renowned or notorious that they are the topic of ordinary people who want to know everything about them. Nonetheless, many famous people are suffering from their lack of privacy therefore, they are not living regular in order to run away from reporters. They live in a risk. For instance, Princess Diana passed away in a car accident as she attempted to escape photographers in a chase through Paris. Moreover, The James
Bond actor (Daniel Craig) said that “I can not live a normal life” he hates having to focus on his actions in public since he became a star. “You talk to people in the movie business who have been doing this 40 years and they all say the difference is that, back in the day, you could go and have a drink in the bar, get drunk, fall over, have a nice time, be relaxed, and no one would know about it” (Glamour,2012). However, now everyone has a camera. “Therefore, he cannot live a regular life anymore. Because it will become public knowledge that you’ve gotten drunk in a bar or skinny-dipped on a beach or something. (Glamour, 2012)
On the other hand, it is clear that everybody has a right to privacy, but some people may have to give up a part of their life when they are willing to sign up to do something that puts them in the spotlight of a substantial number of people. People see the money and fame when they decide to seek celebrity status, but they forget that you now have to live in a fish bowl. The Paparazzi can be rude and aggressive at times, but you have to take the bitter with the sweet, because they can get your name in the press as well.
It always seems funny to some people that some celebrities seem to be able to avoid photographer and media when they want to. Drew Barrymore did an interview where the reporter asked her how she, for the most part, doesn’t get into media conflicts these days (The Guardian, 2015). She says that she avoids the Chateau Marmont, the Grove and the hottest restaurants and clubs that she knows the photographer hang out. She just does not go around asking for trouble when she knows it can be avoided.
Conclusion In conclusion, the privacy situation is getting substantial and the concerns for the privacy of the celebrities have started increasing lately, in a time when there is still no clear legislation in relation to personal privacy online. It has been demonstrated that the newspaper, social media and magazine should be stopped from being posting and publishing personal and private details and stories of well known people which might lead them to live happy life and also there should be rules to control photographers from taking pictures of private things which might cause a problem for them.
